Most people I show Claude to use it like a fancy chat box. They paste a problem, take the answer, close the tab, repeat. That is the most expensive way to use it, both in tokens and in your own time. After a year of working with Claude as my engineering partner, here is the playbook I actually use.
Token cost is the first thing to internalize. Every message you send is the entire conversation so far, sent again. By message 30 of a long thread, you are paying to re-process every word of the previous 29. Two practical fixes: start fresh sessions for new tasks, which is the cost-equivalent of a clean room, and use prompt caching for the parts of context that do not change. If you have a 4,000-token system prompt that is the same on every call, cache it once and pay roughly a tenth of the price on every subsequent call. It compounds fast.
Manage context like a budget. Long context is a tool, not a default. The current models carry a million-token window, but filling it is not the same as using it well. A million-token conversation is not more thorough. It is slower, more expensive, and surprisingly more error-prone, because the model has to rank what matters across more noise. My rule: if a thread runs past about 30 turns or 50k tokens, summarize and start fresh. I keep a one-paragraph carry-over in a notes file and paste it into the next session.
Use skills. Skills are small, scoped specifications that teach Claude how to do a particular task: write a PR review, generate a migration, do a security audit. Once you write them once, you do not re-explain the rules every time. I have skills for writing case studies, drafting commit messages, reviewing schemas, and triaging bug reports. Each one saves me 10 to 15 minutes of preamble per use, which adds up to hours per week.
Pick the right model for the task. I run on two. Fable is the heavyweight, so it gets architecture, hard reasoning, and the debugging that has already defeated one attempt. Opus is the workhorse and takes everything else, which is most of the work by volume. Fable costs roughly twice what Opus does per token, so the discipline is starting on Opus and escalating only when the problem has earned it. Reaching for the most expensive model by default is the single easiest way to make an automation that runs thousands of times a month stop being affordable. Check the pricing page before you budget, because these numbers move with every release.
Tool use efficiency. When you ask Claude to call multiple tools, structure the prompt so independent tools run in parallel. If you have to fetch three files, ask for them in one message and the model can dispatch all three at once. This is the difference between a 20-second turn and a 5-second turn. The same applies in reverse: do not bundle tools that depend on each other into one call.
The step-by-step starter setup. (1) Create a CLAUDE.md in your project root with the rules of engagement: your style, your stack, your standing decisions. This becomes the system prompt and benefits from caching. (2) Write 2 or 3 skills for tasks you do every week. Start small. (3) Set up a budget alarm in your account dashboard so token cost never surprises you. (4) Adopt the fresh-session-per-task habit. (5) Once a month, review your usage and trim.
The shape of the workflow matters more than any single trick. The best Claude users I know have one thing in common: they treat the model as a colleague with a memory problem, competent and fast, but bring the context every time. Build your workflow around that, and the cost takes care of itself.